This is an excellent explanation. I would only add that, with most modern hardware, segmenting is not that complicated as long as you realize that VLANs will need to be routed between.
It won't do you much benefit to have a super efficient VLAN setup that uses a heavily oversbuscribed router on a stick to pass traffic between the segments. David Pashley David Pashley We're running XP without WINS at the moment - doing an nbtstat -r does seem to suggest we're getting an amount of broadcast traffic.
Measure it with something like Wireshark and see what's going on. WINS isn't a horrible thing. I was with you right up until you mention routing overhead. True, I didn't catch the part in the original post about the 3COM switches being able to route traffic between VLAN's without the need for routers so I'm going to assume that they're L3 switches.
They may work at wire speed, but they're still routers to configure and manage, even if they're just layer 3 entities inside switches. If they "switch" packets at layer 3 they're routers. They're helpful for keeping the nugget in accounting from setting up a webcam with the IP of the mail server They're also useful for preventing DHCP broadcasts for reaching unwanted network devices. Mitigating performance problems has already been mentioned, thank you. Sign up or log in Sign up using Google.
Sign up using Facebook. Sign up using Email and Password. Post as a guest Name. Email Required, but never shown. The Overflow Blog. Does ES6 make JavaScript frameworks obsolete? Podcast Do polyglots have an edge when it comes to mastering programming Featured on Meta.
Now live: A fully responsive profile. When we see the benefits apart from security, the bandwidth is high when the number of the user makes the traffic at the same time. The network can be designed based on a group of users or workgroups. Take an example of an institute, the network workgroup would be configured based on departments. Likewise, it can occur in all business units and when we set up this network, we need to spend some time understanding the landscape how best to group the users.
It will preserve the bandwidth of other applications and need to ensure voice quality. The default VLAN can be referred to as two types. The first one is referred to all the ports on the device is belong to one when the switch is on.
On the second one refers, some network manager is configured with the VLAN based on all the ports are assigned even when the switch is not in used. The native VLAN is one the untagged traffic accept when it is received on the trunk port. This is as much for quality of service as it is for protection. Anytime real time voice traffic has to compete for bandwidth, there is the potential for performance degradation.
Security concerns are to some extent relieved by the VLANs as well. Tools such as Wireshark can not only capture but decode and play voice traffic so it is important to keep voice traffic separated wherever possible. Other important network devices such as servers or even users of sensitive data should be placed in their own VLANs.
In addition to the reasons already stated, many vendors have features that allow the creation of VLAN specific security and QoS policies. This chapter has discussed the need to isolate traffic. Organizations need not forward data to every single port because this is inefficient and represents a security risk due to potential eavesdroppers. There are several configuration items that should be part of any VLAN deployment checklist.
One of the biggest challenges associated with deploying a network device is understanding default behavior. Switches and routers are no different, particularly as the number of features increases. One of these items is the default configuration mode of the ports on the switch.
Most switch ports will wind up connected to computers and so will act as access ports. What is not obvious is that on many devices, the default configuration is not access , but dynamic. This means that the port is willing to negotiate the mode of operation. If two switches are connected together, and one switch is configured with a trunk port, it is often the case that it will generate dynamic trunking protocol messages.
Once received, this message may cause the second switch to convert its port to a trunk automatically. This is shown in Figure Initially this auto-configuration sounds convenient but what is to stop an attacker from generating the same message and converting a port in the same way? In addition to allowing the attacker to learn more about the network, it also means that the attacker may be able to generate tagged frames that will be delivered over the entire network.
Whenever possible, dynamic configuration should be turned off. In addition to pruning for proper VLAN boundaries and the default configurations of the ports, it may be prudent to add a couple of additional configuration changes. Anyone connecting to a port in this VLAN will be isolated. In addition, many vendors offer security enhancements to ports such as authorized MAC addresses and restricting the number of MAC addresses allowed.
When invalid MAC addresses are seen on the port, the port will automatically be shutdown or disabled. VLANs are a basic tool for creating network boundaries. While they can create challenges regarding the forwarding of traffic, they can be a powerful tool for handling security and quality of service concerns.
When deploying VLANs and trunks, there are several design considerations to take into account. It is important to review the default operation and configuration of network elements in order to ensure that locally created configurations do not place the network at risk.
In a contemporary data network, the primary used of a trunk line is to convey VLAN information. While they are both part of a switch, the source address table and the VLANs are not integrated in any way. Dynamic port mode is a security risk because by default attackers can see all unpruned VLAN traffic. Note: A home gateway may be used if it can be converted to a router to avoid confusion over the NAT operation.
Note: The goal of this particular activity is simply to understand the basic configuration necessary for routing between VLANs without trunks, as shown in Figure As an example one VLAN might use Handy Cisco command: switchport access vlan X.
At this point, the nodes on different networks should be able to successfully PING each other. Once the topology from activity 1 is complete, PING between all of the nodes and router interfaces.
On the switch, examine the source address MAC address table. Handy Cisco command: show mac-address-table. Using the information in the SAT and the routing table of the router, develop a step by step procedure for forwarding packets from one computer to the other. This will cause an ARP request to be transmitted.
It turns out that Windows-based computers periodically generate multicast traffic as they search for services. Did the capture node in the other VLAN see the unicast, multicast or broadcast traffic that was created by the source host? As an additional experiment, change the IP address of the capture host so that it is on the same network as the source host.
They should now be on the same network but in different VLANs. Attempt to PING between these two nodes. This attempt should fail because even though they are on the same network, the switch has separated them and the traffic is not allowed to cross the VLAN boundary. Move one host into each VLAN. If you have a shortage of computers, it is sufficient to place one in a VLAN on the first switch and a second in the other VLAN on the new switch, as shown in Figure On each switch, configure as trunks the ports used to interconnect the two switches.
Handy Cisco commands: switchport mode trunk, switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q. As an additional experiment, explore the capabilities of the switches and attempt to set up a host capable of capturing the traffic running over the trunk. This is typically done with a span, mirror or monitor port.
The goal is to examine the IEEE Handy Cisco command: monitor session. Skip to main content. Start your free trial. Chapter 4. Figure Before and after collision. Broadcast domain. Broadcast frame growth. Basic switch and VLAN topology.
Router, switch and VLANs. Single switch, multiple VLANs. Since switch forwarding behavior is based on MAC addresses stored in the source address table, the following rules apply: For known unicast destinations, the switch will forward the frame to the destination port only.
Aims and benefits from the Noncontinuous VLANs. Static VLAN, local membership. Moving from one VLAN to another. Solution: Dynamic VLANs However, if the switch is smart enough to recognize that PC4 has now moved to a new port, it may be able to automatically repair the connection. New dynamic VLAN topology. Multiple switches, single VLAN. Problems with additional VLANs. Topology repaired with trunking. Use at least a gigabit backbone between switches, preferably more: trunk ports between switches and the server room, or stack switches, to give maximum bandwith for the network core.
Separate VLAN for vistors to provide external internet access only. All our switches are HP layer 2 devices, so with the external internet VLANS using a totally separate IP address range, we had to bring an old Cisco router back into service so that we could push everything out through our firewall. CedarsHost is an IT service provider.
It has been decided to create 4 VLANs, which will split up the PCs into four - Upper and lower building 1 and upper and lower building two. There will also be a management VLAN. Not sure if this is the best way. Do the printers need a VLAN? Subnetting would seem to be more appropriate for splitting your LAN into 4 segments. Someone had mooted about splitting it further and having separate VLAN's for each department, but since we have just one set of servers and not such a complex network, I don't wish to make it more complex than necessary or add a load of work to the routers.
I wouldn't recommend you to configure too many unnecessary VLANs because of the higher complexity. Not to forget, as you said, one VLAN for management.
You should ask yourself the question why you need vlan's. If you separate on layer2 and hardware need to talk to each other all traffic will have to pass on your router. There is no need for security here, it is just for management and network traffic.
So I am thinking our existing plan is a good one.
0コメント